The WG News

archive

  • Home
  • Food + Drink
  • Culture
    • Art
    • Music
    • Film
    • Theater
  • Local
    • Commentary
    • Environment
    • Politics
    • Education
    • Real Estate

Who knew low-income wage earners are subsidizing the developers?

April 15, 2013 By Phil DePaolo Leave a Comment

The New New Domino:Déjà vu All Over Again

As I predicted, CPC Resources, the original developer for the Domino Sugar Refinery, flipped the property to a new developer, Two Trees Management, for a huge $120 million profit. So there’s a new plan afoot for the refinery, one the new developer has made even larger than CPC Resources’ massive plan, and one that is much larger than what is currently on the Williamsburg waterfront.

Screen Shot 2013-04-15 at 11.48.14 AM

The new Domino plan, created by SHoP Architects, would take 15 years to build, according to the developer. But remember that Bruce Ratner initially said the entire Atlantic Yards project would be built in 10 years. Now that number has been revised to 25 years.

The new proposed plan is said to offer increased open space, and maybe the same amount of affordable housing (660 units). At a recent meeting at The Woods, in Brooklyn, the developer claimed that the affordable housing would be offered to residents earning 60% ($45,000) to 80% ($65,000) of the citywide area median income (AMI). However, the AMI for Community Board #1 is $41,000, with most of the residents who are facing displacement earning $17,000 to $29,000 per year. A current lottery for affordable units at 1560 Fulton Street in Brooklyn at 80% of AMI is offering one-bedroom apartments at $1,887 per month. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the fair market rent (FMR) for a two-bedroom apartment in New York State is $1,313.

In order to afford this level of rent and utilities without paying more than 30% of one’s income on housing, a household must earn $4,376 monthly, or $52,513 annually. Assuming a 40-hour workweek, 52 weeks per year, this level of income translates into a housing wage of $25.25 per hour.

In New York, a minimum wage worker earns an hourly wage of $7.25. In order to afford the FMR for a two-bedroom apartment, a minimum wage earner must work 139 hours per week, 52 weeks per year. Or, a household must include 3.5 minimum wage earners working 40 hours per week, year-round, to make the two-bedroom FMR affordable.

In New York, the estimated average wage for a renter is $21.59 per hour. To afford the FMR for a two-bedroom apartment at this wage, a renter must work 47 hours per week, 52 weeks per year. Or, working 40 hours per week year-round, a household must include 1.2 workers earning the mean renter wage to make the two-bedroom FMR affordable. So at higher rents this so-called affordable housing becomes out-of-reach housing. And believe me, affordable housing is a cash bonanza. In exchange for 660 units of affordable housing, Two Trees can get $100 million in federal Section 8 subsidies and low income housing tax credits, direct funding and low interest loans from New York City HPD/HDC, and 421a property tax breaks from the city. In other words, tax dollars, some of which come from low income working residents who will be priced out of the new Domino!

The new Domino plan calls for a 598-foot tower (an almost 60-story building), much taller than the previous 40-story limit, and two 590-foot towers. The inland property is reported to also include a tower that would be 270 feet, also much larger than what CPC Resources was going to build. There will be 2,284 apartments, up from 2,200, and 630,000 square feet of office space, up from 100,000. The new office space will add up to 4,000 people to the community.

Below is the comparison chart produced by Two Trees. The original plan called for up to 2,400 units, but CPC Resources planned to build 2,200 units:

Two Trees head Jed Walentas was quoted at a community meeting at The Woods as saying, “We spent $185 million on the site and we are going to make a return.” In reality, Two Trees paid $55 per buildable square foot based on the request for 3.37 million square feet. Two Trees is also saying they are increasing the project’s open space by 60%, to 5.3 acres, and plan to include a floating pool, kayak launch, esplanade, and seasonal ice-skating rink. But with thousands more office workers, how much open space is really added?

Two Trees has leverage and has already flexed its muscle by telling community leaders that if their new vision is not approved, they will build CPC Resources’ original plan, which, due to a failure by City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, made the “guaranteed claims” of CPC Resources for 30% affordability housing non-binding for Two Trees. Two Trees will begin the land use review in the next few months, so the community begins another chapter in the Domino Sugar saga. Stay tuned.

« The Lowdown on an Upright Citizen: Comedian Anthony Apruzzese
Bindlestiff Family Circus: Clown and Sculptor Unicyclists Cross the Williamsburg Bridge »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • Art
  • Art Openings
  • Bars
  • Beauty
  • Bicycles
  • Bits
  • Body
  • Books + Readings
  • Comedy
  • Commentary
  • Community
  • Design
  • Dig & Be Dug
  • Eating Again
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Fashion
  • Featured Story
  • Fiction
  • Film
  • Food + Drink
  • Gardening
  • Hacks
  • Halloweenie
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Issues by the Number
  • Kids
  • Latest News
  • LGBT
  • Made in Brooklyn
  • Medical
  • Music
  • none
  • Performance
  • Personal Essay
  • Phil On Fire
  • Photo of the Day
  • Politics
  • Radio + Streaming
  • Real Estate
  • Recipes
  • Religion
  • Shopping
  • Tech
  • The Newscap
  • Theatre
  • Transportation
  • Trent's Picks
  • TV and Streaming
  • Uncategorized
  • Vintage
  • WG Photo
  • WG Picks
  • Wine

Archives

  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009

Copyright © 2025 · f on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in